[D] How can I improve cross-patient generalization on a small hysteroscopy dataset with correlated frames?
|
I am working with the HS-CMU hysteroscopy dataset, which contains:
Before attempting the complete multiclass problem, I reduced it to a binary subset to verify that the training and evaluation pipeline works correctly. Current binary subset
Patient-disjoint split
Approaches I have tried
With the correct patient-level split, training performance improves, but validation performance generally plateaus or deteriorates, and performance on unseen test patients remains relatively low. As a diagnostic, I also tried a random frame-level split and obtained substantially better results. However, this evaluation is invalid because correlated frames from the same patients appear across training, validation, and testing, causing patient leakage and inflated performance. I would appreciate advice on how to improve generalization to unseen patients in this setting. submitted by /u/Aggravating_Dot5315 |