Why iRobot chose not to give Roomba a real personality
 |
Colin Angle explains that giving a robot a voice does more than change the interface. It changes the user’s entire understanding of what the machine can do. Roomba eventually received spoken maintenance messages because communicating problems such as clogged rollers or a lost Wi-Fi connection through sequences of beeps created a poor user experience. But iRobot intentionally made those messages sound like a separate utility or maintenance system rather than Roomba itself speaking. Once a robot appears conversational, users begin expecting language understanding, memory, contextual awareness and consistent behavior across long periods of time. Angle says delivering all of that reliably remains difficult, even with current natural-language systems. Keeping Roomba’s personality undefined allowed people to personify the robot on their own terms without the product making promises its underlying intelligence could not fulfill. submitted by /u/Responsible-Grass452 |
